What is the actual aim behind valuation?

From this position we propose actions to encourage the more positive engagement of older people in their local community. We recognise the challenges facing the workforce but believe the move to integrating through local partnerships will create a workforce that requires investment but also one of which we can feel proud. Nor have we addressed the wicked issues of free personal care. Rather we see that there is unfinished business in this area and that the place to focus this debate is around the nature of the social contract.

There is a broad consensus around childhood and parenting but none around ageing. This needs a debate about the expectations the state holds about responsible citizenship and the information they need to help individuals make long term plans for their old age, and a clear view on how the state engages in the management of personal risk. Even fewer would be happy for them to have equal access to local health and housing services. for more info : Adelaide Property Valuers

Similarly, although 78 percent of those polled believe asylum seekers should be allowed to work while their application is being considered, fewer than half would want their own boss to employ them. In some part at least, this helps explain the recent rise of the British National Party. In the 2003 local elections, the party promised that BNP councillors would do. They won 14 seats and came second in a further 47 wards. Since then, asylum seekers have rarely been out of the headlines for more than a few days at a time.

All the political parties have realised the importance of the issue in terms of potential votes for the 2005 general election. result has been a stream of policies and arguments that appear to have far more to do with scoring points with the electorate than improving the welfare of people fleeing persecution. In July 2002, the government decided to scrap the concession that allowed asylum seekers to work if their applications took more than six months to process - a decision that affected almost 23,000 asylum seekers in the second quarter of 2003 alone.